JoshuaZ comments on Inverse Speed - Less Wrong

14 Post author: komponisto 27 March 2011 05:57AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (56)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Oscar_Cunningham 27 March 2011 09:44:22AM 20 points [-]

For some reason no one does the obvious cancellation to end up in m^2. This even has an intuitive meaning, it's the cross-section that a line of fuel would need so that as you travelled along it you'd be "picking it up" at the same rate you were burning it.

Comment author: JoshuaZ 27 March 2011 04:39:18PM *  7 points [-]

That's not nearly as helpful for most people. They don't think in terms like that as having an intuitive meaning simply because cars don't work that way. When people think of problems of this sort they frequently use other data about the reference classes to help them. If you alter the behavior of the reference class they will generate confusion. For example, that's why so many people have trouble with "If some doctors are men, and some men are tall, does it follow that some doctors are tall?" but don't have trouble with "If some US Presidents were Republican and some Republicans were women, does it follow that some US Presidents were women?" Don't underestimate how much people use the actual behavior of a class to guide them rather than just the section of it that you have abstracted.