XiXiDu comments on Free Will as Unsolvability by Rivals - Less Wrong

20 Post author: Pavitra 28 March 2011 03:28AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (11)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: XiXiDu 28 March 2011 03:41:09PM *  1 point [-]

Pavitra, I'd love to know what you think about my post on free will:

For example, children and some mentally handicapped people are not responsible in the same way as healthy adults. They cannot give consent or enter into legally binding contracts. One of the reasons for this is that they lack control, are easily influenced by others. Healthy humans exert a higher control than children and handicapped people. You experience, or possess a greater extent of freedom proportional to the amount of influence and effectiveness of control you exert over the environment versus the environment over you.

In other words, I think a paperclip maximizer is dangerous because it has more free will, i.e. is free to (not free from) realize what it wants as its effect on the universe is much larger than that of a human(s). An agent's perception to be free is therefore correlated with the ability to realize its goals, the probability of success.

Comment author: Pavitra 29 March 2011 06:30:26PM 0 points [-]

Your linked post seems to be more about an agent interacting with a dumb-matter environment, and about the relationship between free will and determinism. My post is specifically about what happens when two agents interact with each other. The point I was trying to make is that the sense of indignation that accompanies the intuition of free will is tied to the desire to protect one's utility function from alteration in the presence of a hostile intelligence.

Your comment bridges the two nicely.