Perplexed comments on John Baez Interviews with Eliezer (Parts 2 and 3) - Less Wrong
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (34)
I don't think you said what you mean.
But that is pretty much beside the point, because
You have provided no reasons why I should think that what you meant is true.
We are not talking about increasing confidence in a system by testing it. Certainly Eliezer is not talking about 'test-cases'. We are talking about proofs of correctness.
Uh, no way! Indeterminism is best not defined in terms of humans.
I'm not sure what your point is here. Are you saying that 'indeterminism', in the sense of your substituted definition, is what you really meant when you wrote:
?
If so, what do you propose we do about it?
The intended idea was pretty simple: in a deterministic system if you test it, and it works you know it will work under the same circumstances in the future - whereas in a system that lacks determinism, if you test it, and it works, that doesn't mean it will work in the future.