Giles comments on Rationality Quotes: April 2011 - Less Wrong

6 Post author: benelliott 04 April 2011 09:55AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (384)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Giles 04 April 2011 03:10:37PM *  13 points [-]

Was the buyer sane enough to realise that it probably wasn't a power crystal, or just sane enough to realise that if he pretended it wasn't a power crystal he'd save $135?

Is that amount of raising-the-sanity waterline worth $135 to Tony?

I would guess it's guilt-avoidance at work here.

(EDIT: your thanks to Tony are still valid though!)

Comment author: childofbaud 04 April 2011 08:55:09PM *  7 points [-]

And with that in mind, how would it have affected the sanity waterline if Tony had donated that $135 to an institution that's pursuing the improvement of human rationality?

Comment author: Eliezer_Yudkowsky 05 April 2011 04:35:44AM 40 points [-]

Look, sometimes you've just got to do things because they're awesome.

Comment author: thomblake 07 April 2011 08:27:45PM 2 points [-]

But would you feel comfortable with that maxim encoded in an AI's utility function?

Comment author: Alicorn 07 April 2011 08:38:20PM 13 points [-]

For a sufficiently rigorous definition of "awesome", why not?

Comment author: benelliott 08 April 2011 07:54:21AM 4 points [-]

If its a terminal value then CEV should converge to it.