= 27d567bc2d48d9f40e9ccc20ea370b15)
Armok_GoB comments on Interest in video-conference discussion about sequences and/or virtual meetups? - Less Wrong
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
= 783df68a0f980790206b9ea87794c5b6)
Loading…= b715d02e85f7b3b4ae65ca3d3e450868)
Subscribe to RSS Feed
Powered by Reddit
= f037147d6e6c911a85753b9abdedda8d)
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (30)
I am strongly interested in comunity, extremely isolated, and fairly miserable about it so somehting like this is somehting I'd REALLY want to be in on.
Relevant info: incapable of catching planing events most of the time but on skype most of the time so if the conference is to it shouldn't be a problem. Have read most of the sequences, but out of order so I might have missed the occasional article here and there. European timezone. Would prefer the group of the highest level if there are several to chose from. I might also be interested in being in more than one group if that's not frowned upon.
You are in Group A; please post HERE to coordinate with the others in your "virtual meetup."
Planning discussion thread on g-groups is now HERE
Sounds great. I created a Google Group per jsalvatier's suggestion) for finalizing details. With the number of people I expect (perhaps between 10-15 when all is said and done), I'm thinking that splitting into groups of 3 will make the most sense. I'm open to changing this idea, but think that 3 will help with the "connectedness feel" and also not ruin everyone's experience off the bat due to bandwidth (not sure what 3+ audio and possibly video streams requires re. internet speed -- I only have 1.5mbps).