steven0461 comments on 96 Bad Links in the Sequences - Less Wrong

34 Post author: Alexandros 07 April 2011 10:39AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (27)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Louie 18 April 2011 04:33:15PM 11 points [-]

I wanted to calibrate myself for how ridiculous it is to ask someone to read the sequences. For example, the King James Bible is 788,280 words. So asking someone to read the sequences is quantitively similar to asking them to read 1.16 bibles.

Even Christians won't read the Bible cover to cover. And they believe the Bible is the word of God, contains all the most important wisdom in existence, and even a magical formula for making them live in paradise...forever! Infinite expected utility: Not enough to make someone read a bible.

We're lucky our target audience is more literate and that our text is way more interesting (and not as morally bankrupt) to read... but still. The number of people willing to read a giant philosophical text the size of the bible based on something like a friend's recommendation is... not so big.

Comment author: steven0461 27 April 2011 08:28:53PM 3 points [-]

Perhaps we should be saying "skim the sequences".