jimrandomh comments on What are you working on? April 2011 - Less Wrong

5 Post author: jsalvatier 07 April 2011 05:56PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (62)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: jimrandomh 14 April 2011 12:42:24AM 2 points [-]

This isn't really that important, but do you know if anyone has actually shown in a rigorous way that CDT two-boxes on Newcomb's problem?

No one has, because CDT isn't rigorous enough to bring into a proof framework without first disambiguating it, and there is at least one disambiguation that one-boxes and at least one disambiguation that two-boxes.