1. A priori knowledge: Depends on the meaning of "knowledge". A priori beliefs yes, a priori truth no. In general, probably closer to "no".
2. Abstract objects: Nominalism, but it may as well be a meaningless distinction.
3. Aesthetic value: subjective.
4. Analytic-synthetic distinction: no.
5. Epistemic justification: internalism or externalism, as far as I can tell this is a meaningless distinction.
6. External world: non-skeptical realism, if I understand correctly what the other options mean.
7. Free will: compatibilism or no free will, depending on the definition of free will.
8. God: atheism.
9. Knowledge: empiricism.
10. Knowledge claims: contextualism or invariantism, but this is probably meaningless either.
11. Laws of nature: Humean.
12. Logic: classical. Other forms of logic can be useful, but the position of the classical logic can hardly be shattered.
13. Mental content: failed to find a comprehensible definition of either possibilities.
14. Meta-ethics: anti-realism.
15. Metaphilosophy: naturalism.
16. Mind: physicalism.
17. Moral judgment: non-cognitivism. Not sure what's the difference between this and moral anti-realism.
18. Moral motivation: mostly internalism.
19. Newcomb's problem: one box.
20. Normative ethics: mixed.
21. Perceptual experience: can't figure out meanings of the alternatives.
22. Personal identity: there is no ontologically fundamental identity, a confused question.
23. Politics: mixed.
24. Proper names: Fregean.
25. Science: scientific realism.
26. Teletransporter (new matter): undecided, may depend on various details.
27. Time: B-theory.
28. Trolley problem (five straight ahead, one on side track, turn requires switching, what ought one do?): switch (and don't tell anybody).
29. Truth: deflationary.
30. Zombies: inconceivable.

Note that (1) I had to find the meanings of many of the terms before answering the questions and so I am probably mistaken about actual meanings of few philosophical positions, and (2) even in many cases where I gave a unique answer I tend to think that the distinction between the positions lacks practical importance and mostly is a matter of formulation; who has better intuition pumps wins. The answers where these disclaimers don't apply (either because I think one side of the debate is much more elegant than the other, or because I can conceive practical implications of the choice) are in bold.