I actually answered the survey and I think my responses are public somewhere. I'll have to see after if this matches up.
A priori knowledge: yes or no? Agnostic
Abstract objects: Platonism or nominalism? Accept an intermediate view
Aesthetic value: objective or subjective? Accept an intermediate view
Analytic-synthetic distinction: yes or no? Agnostic
Epistemic justification: internalism or externalism? Accept another alternative
External world: idealism, skepticism, or non-skeptical realism? Lean towards non-skeptical realism
Free will: compatibilism, libertarianism, or no free will? Accept compatibilism
God: theism or atheism? Accept Atheism
Knowledge: empiricism or rationalism? Accept both
Knowledge claims: contextualism, relativism, or invariantism? Lean towards contextualism
Laws of nature: Humean or non-Humean? Agnostic
Logic: classical or non-classical? There is no fact of the matter
Mental content: internalism or externalism? Agnostic
Meta-ethics: moral realism or moral anti-realism? Accept moral realism
Metaphilosophy: naturalism or non-naturalism? Accept naturalism
Mind: physicalism or non-physicalism? Accept physicalism
Moral judgment: cognitivism or non-cognitivism? Accept both
Moral motivation: internalism or externalism? Accept both
Newcomb's problem: one box or two boxes? Accept one box
Normative ethics: deontology, consequentialism, or virtue ethics? Accept virtue ethics
Perceptual experience: disjunctivism, qualia theory, representationalism, or sense-datum theory? Insufficiently familiar with the issue
Personal identity: biological view, psychological view, or further-fact view? Agnostic
Politics: communitarianism, egalitarianism, or libertarianism? Lean towards libertarianism
Proper names: Fregean or Millian? Insufficiently familiar with the issue
Science: scientific realism or scientific anti-realism? Accept an intermediate view
Teletransporter (new matter): survival or death? Agnostic
Time: A-theory or B-theory? Insufficiently familiar with the issue
Trolley problem (five straight ahead, one on side track, turn requires switching, what ought one do?): switch or don't switch? Accept another alternative
Truth: correspondence, deflationary, or epistemic? Accept deflationary
Zombies: inconceivable, conceivable but not metaphysically possible, or metaphysically possible? Accept inconceivable
===
And... which of the following philosophers do you identify with?
Aquinas Aristotle Nietzsche
I would have written in Dennett and Emerson were there an option.
I'd like to know your intermediate views, if you ever have time.
The questions are at http://philpapers.org/surveys/oquestions.html. The correlations can be intensely interesting to those who understand philosophical jargon (http://philpapers.org/surveys/linear_most.pl) - it doesn't take too long to look them up as you go - and I actually found it to be a fun way to learn new philosophy. I know that there was a LW thread about this several months ago, but it didn't have a section for people here to respond to the survey. I would be very interested to see how people here would respond.
I'll repost the questions here:
===
Original Survey Questions | PhilPapers Surveys
A priori knowledge: yes or no?
Abstract objects: Platonism or nominalism?
Aesthetic value: objective or subjective?
Analytic-synthetic distinction: yes or no?
Epistemic justification: internalism or externalism?
External world: idealism, skepticism, or non-skeptical realism?
Free will: compatibilism, libertarianism, or no free will?
God: theism or atheism?
Knowledge: empiricism or rationalism?
Knowledge claims: contextualism, relativism, or invariantism?
Laws of nature: Humean or non-Humean?
Logic: classical or non-classical?
Mental content: internalism or externalism?
Meta-ethics: moral realism or moral anti-realism?
Metaphilosophy: naturalism or non-naturalism?
Mind: physicalism or non-physicalism?
Moral judgment: cognitivism or non-cognitivism?
Moral motivation: internalism or externalism?
Newcomb's problem: one box or two boxes?
Normative ethics: deontology, consequentialism, or virtue ethics?
Perceptual experience: disjunctivism, qualia theory, representationalism, or sense-datum theory?
Personal identity: biological view, psychological view, or further-fact view?
Politics: communitarianism, egalitarianism, or libertarianism?
Proper names: Fregean or Millian?
Science: scientific realism or scientific anti-realism?
Teletransporter (new matter): survival or death?
Time: A-theory or B-theory?
Trolley problem (five straight ahead, one on side track, turn requires switching, what ought one do?): switch or don't switch?
Truth: correspondence, deflationary, or epistemic?
Zombies: inconceivable, conceivable but not metaphysically possible, or metaphysically possible?
===
And... which of the following philosophers do you identify with?
The philosophers available to choose from for the "which philosophers do you identify with?" question were:
Anscombe
Aquinas
Aristotle
Augustine
Berkeley
Carnap
Davidson
Descartes
Frege
Hegel
Heidegger
Hobbes
Hume
Husserl
Kant
Kierkegaard
Leibniz
Lewis
Locke
Marx
Mill
Moore
Nietzsche
Plato
Quine
Rawls
Rousseau
Russell
Socrates
Spinoza
Wittgenstein