Cyan comments on Modeling sleep patterns - Less Wrong
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (46)
Prediction isn't magic -- you need relevant information. In this case, if information about the causes of your sleep patterns are not in the time series, you won't be able to accomplish much with this approach.
I note that you include info about caffeine and other drug usage in your data. These are obvious possible causal agents, so it's necessary but not sufficient to have information about them. I suggest the following approach:
Comments:
On point 1, I'd say the odds are better than 50:50 that you've already done the relevant lit review. I still included it in the plan of attack in case you hadn't.
On point 2, I suggest months-long exhaustive data collection only because you've already shown that you are motivated to do it. Also, I think it's important to collect data on your eating habits whether or not it shows up as potentially causal in the lit review.
I notice that the karma on this post has fluctuated a bit. I don't care about the karma per se, but I do care that someone indicated they don't want to see more like this. So I invite any criticism here and now, that I may improve.
I have karma display turned off (greasemonkey script). It stresses me out. I think your comment could certainly expand on point 3/4. Really what I was looking for as a response to the post is a good pointer on what sort of algorithms or tools could potentially give me good results on this problem to direct my studying, and perhaps what textbooks or introductions I should be reading.
But point 1 is good. I hadn't thought to do that. I was just going to go on common sense, and a kitchen sink approach.
Would it have improved the comment if I had stated explicitly at the start that my reply was not directly responsive to your request but rather addressed an oversight/implicit assumption?