NancyLebovitz comments on We are not living in a simulation - Less Wrong

-9 Post author: dfranke 12 April 2011 01:55AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (211)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: NancyLebovitz 13 April 2011 03:06:27PM 6 points [-]

Basically, you can't be indignant about being assumed male; only about being assumed at all. This means you can't take any personal affront, because now you are criticizing someone else's style of expression, not being personally insulted or attacked.

Telling people what they can't feel when it's obvious that they're feeling it isn't likely to have the effect you want.

Sidetrack: I thought "guy" wasn't all that strongly gendered any more, but I seem to be wrong about that.

Comment author: shokwave 13 April 2011 03:16:53PM 5 points [-]

Good point. I had in mind Eliezer's "the way opposes your fear / the way opposes your calm" when I wrote that part, and reading it without that specific mindset it does appear quite off-putting.

Comment author: Alicorn 13 April 2011 03:10:05PM 5 points [-]

I thought "guy" wasn't all that strongly gendered any more, but I seem to be wrong about that.

"Guys" as a plural in the second person isn't gendered ("you guys"). In other grammatical contexts it is quite male.