dfranke comments on We are not living in a simulation - Less Wrong

-9 Post author: dfranke 12 April 2011 01:55AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (211)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: dfranke 13 April 2011 03:29:07PM *  0 points [-]

s/are not zombies/have qualia/ and you'll get a little more accurate. A zombie, supposing such a thing is possible (which I doubt for all the reasons given in http://lesswrong.com/lw/p7/zombies_zombies ), is still a real, physical object. The objects of a simulation don't even rise to zombie status.

Comment author: Jonathan_Graehl 14 April 2011 08:18:16PM 2 points [-]

A zombie ... is still a real, physical object. The objects of a simulation don't even rise to zombie status.

It's really unclear what you mean by 'zombie', 'real, physical object', and 'objects of a simulation'. But you're right that Kevin meant by 'zombie' exactly 'us without qualia'. I thought this was obvious in context.

Comment author: Kevin 14 April 2011 08:57:06AM 1 point [-]

What is a physical object?

Comment author: jsalvatier 14 April 2011 06:17:11PM 0 points [-]

If you are not arguing for zombies, I am really confused about what you're trying to argue for.