MichaelVassar comments on Levels of Action - Less Wrong

106 Post author: alyssavance 14 April 2011 12:18AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (47)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: MichaelVassar 14 April 2011 07:21:00AM 2 points [-]

The characterization of Aristotle's assumption is a straw-man. Think 'abstract' not 'useless'.

Comment author: gwern 14 April 2011 06:05:23PM 1 point [-]

If you think that's a straw-man, you would have hated the original draft on the OB NYC ML even more.

Comment author: Benquo 14 April 2011 12:13:19PM 1 point [-]

Isn't the problem that he conflated the two? At the very least, it looks to me like he nad no expectation that the ability to use or test a proposition had much bearing on its truth.

On the other hand, it does seem that he had no objection to "going out and looking".

Aristotle's physics reflects his desire to describe what he actually saw in the world, and his reluctance to either reduce physical phenomena to mathematical abstractions, or to report on what nature does when forced by experiments.