glunkthunker comments on Build Small Skills in the Right Order - Less Wrong

90 Post author: lukeprog 17 April 2011 11:01PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (213)

Sort By: Leading

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: glunkthunker 20 April 2011 06:44:57PM 2 points [-]

original comment:

Perhaps we could institute a norm that posting anecdotes without making conclusions from them is okay.

how its read:

Anecdotes with conclusions should not be allowed.

I find this transition very curious and see it often. Is there a term for this kind of reactive twist of reasoning?

Comment author: TheOtherDave 20 April 2011 07:13:48PM 4 points [-]

I don't know of a term for the thing you're describing, but the inverse thing -- where someone who thinks "Anecdotes with conclusions should not be allowed" ends up saying "Perhaps we could institute a norm that posting anecdotes without making conclusions from them is okay" is sometimes called "indirection" or "hedging." (Or, in some circles, "being polite.")

They are, of course, related: my knowledge of the existence of indirection in the world makes it more likely that I will interpret "Perhaps we could institute a norm that posting anecdotes without making conclusions from them is okay" as an expression of the thought "Anecdotes with conclusions should not be allowed" (as well as a wide range of other thoughts).

Perhaps the inverse of indirection should be called "dereferencing"?