ArisKatsaris comments on Specific Fiction Discusion (April 2011) - Less Wrong

6 Post author: Armok_GoB 14 April 2011 12:29PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (158)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Armok_GoB 14 April 2011 12:31:26PM *  10 points [-]
Comment author: ArisKatsaris 14 April 2011 11:12:03PM 8 points [-]

The "Feeling Pinkie Keen" episode may be fun to analyze from a rationalist/Bayesian perspective. Was Twilight Sparkle being rational to jump based on Pinkie Pie's sense at the end? What would have to be the priors at the beginning of the episode for it to be the correct decision at the end, after all the accumulated evidence? :-)

Comment author: Raemon 15 April 2011 05:27:51PM 10 points [-]

I just watched that the other day and had the same reaction. I was annoyed that the ending moral was "okay, I can't understand it and it's just mysterious and that's okay," rather than "okay, I don't understand how it works NOW, but clearly there's something to this. I should continue to study it and in the meantime treat it as a valuable source of evidence."

I wasn't that annoyed though, because a few episodes prior Twilight had been totally right about a "curse" not being magic at all, with a "scientific explanation" instead.

Also amused that Twilight has a secret science lab with an MRI machine that she never uses again.

Comment author: Armok_GoB 15 April 2011 08:01:22PM 5 points [-]

Semi relevant; I posted the following LWish thing in a discussion thread on a forum:

"we here have an enormous amount of extremely strong and general evidence that excludes huge areas of hypothesis space. This is the STRONGLY DOMINANT reason you shouldn't believe certain kinds of things even if someone you trust sincerely tells you to. Things like "physical laws don't have exceptions, no exceptions", "¨there are no irreducibly mental (=supernatural) phenomena", "Due to huge flaws in the way human brains work, billions of people CAN be wrong, and frequently are. You can't even trust your own brain.". We have no reason to believe Equestria and ponykind have similar overriding principles. "

(Please note that this was not written for LW, so therefore I were sloppy and also oversimplifying things due to inferential distance.)

Comment author: Armok_GoB 15 April 2011 09:25:35AM 3 points [-]

I haven't gotten that far yet, but from what I've heard it would indeed.