= 27d567bc2d48d9f40e9ccc20ea370b15)
fortyeridania comments on The Bias You Didn't Expect - Less Wrong
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
= 783df68a0f980790206b9ea87794c5b6)
Loading…= b715d02e85f7b3b4ae65ca3d3e450868)
Subscribe to RSS Feed
Powered by Reddit
= f037147d6e6c911a85753b9abdedda8d)
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (90)
Doesn't this strongly cut against the theory that the degree of hunger at the time of the hearing influences the decision?
The Israeli parole result was for a short single high-stakes decision; most hearings are not like that, I think.
... is the exact response I wanted to make.
Most legal choices are either incredibly short term - like an objection that a judge must often respond to immediately - or medium to long term - like a motion that a judge will ask for parties to provide briefs (written legal arguments) on. Parole hearing like this are one a few legal decisions where there really is a quick decision made - another area would be bail hearings, but there the outcome isn't binary, it's a dollar amount. There isn't much money to be made in gaming either,.
No. The study was specifically on parole decisions, which often are made at the time of the hearing, although other judicial decisions generally aren't.