RichardKennaway comments on Offense versus harm minimization - Less Wrong

60 Post author: Yvain 16 April 2011 01:06AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (417)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: RichardKennaway 16 April 2011 06:59:02AM 14 points [-]

My first reaction to this was "is this a guest post by Robin Hanson under Yvain's name, to see if anyone notices?"

You could argue Brits did not choose to have their abnormal sensitivity to salmon while Muslims might be considered to be choosing their sensitivity to Mohammed. But this requires a libertarian free will.

Well, no it doesn't. Muslims observably do make a choice in the matter (as proved by the fact that they discuss it and take different views). (Link.) To equate this with aliens hard-wiring our brains to graft on an arbitrary offense-trigger is plain no-free-will determinism, whereby the past reaches past the present to cause the future, just as the alien reaches past our internal functions to cause offense-taking at an arbitrary stimulus.

Comment author: Yvain 16 April 2011 07:40:53PM 6 points [-]

My first reaction to this was "is this a guest post by Robin Hanson under Yvain's name, to see if anyone notices?"

Part of me wants to feel complimented by that, another part wants to challenge you to pistols at dawn.

Comment author: David_Gerard 17 April 2011 08:40:30AM 7 points [-]

Will the pistols be near or far?

Comment author: RichardKennaway 17 April 2011 07:52:58AM 2 points [-]

That wacky Robin Hanson, eh? Never can tell whether there's method in his madness, or madness in his method!