timtyler comments on Friendly to who? - Less Wrong

2 Post author: TimFreeman 16 April 2011 11:43AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (38)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: timtyler 17 April 2011 09:30:48PM *  1 point [-]

Quoting Eliezer: "A minor, muddled preference of 60% of humanity might be countered by a strong, unmuddled preference of 10% of humanity." So any good Marxist will be able to imagine the rich and powerful getting their way in the computation of CEV just as they get their way today: by inducing muddle in the masses.

There's little reason for them to bother with such nonsense - if they are building and paying for the thing in the first place.

CEV may be a utilitarian's wet dream - but it will most-likely look like a crapshoot to the millionaires who are actually likely to be building machine intelligence.