robertk comments on Official Less Wrong Redesign: Call for Suggestions - Less Wrong

20 Post author: Louie 20 April 2011 05:56PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (565)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: [deleted] 21 April 2011 10:40:42PM *  3 points [-]

I'm not a designer and my taste in typography might be unusual, but I can try to pin down what makes reading it uncomfortable for me personally:

(1) Arial (the default font) is much less readable than other fonts. At least one informal survey suggest users prefer Verdana over Arial 2 to 1. I agree completely. Readability uses Georgia, which also seems more readable to me.

(2) "Justified" text (where each word lines up on the rightmost edge of the paragraph) is harder for me to read than unjustified text. According to Wikipedia, it noticeably impairs comprehension for people with dyslexia, too.

(3) There are too many characters per line. My understanding is that in web typography, the "standard rule" (not universally accepted) is 55-75 characters per line. On its default setting, Readability averages around 70, which feels comfortable to me. Less Wrong has ~115 characters per line, which feels too wide. With a more readable font, this might not be an issue, but I definitely notice it with the current design.

(4) Text is too small. This is a minor complaint, since you can adjust it in the browser. But by default, the text feels uncomfortably small to me.

Comment author: Alicorn 21 April 2011 10:52:38PM 5 points [-]

I have a very strong preference for justified text. It makes the shape of paragraphs regular and less distracting.

Comment author: wedrifid 21 April 2011 11:28:12PM 1 point [-]

Absolutely. Non-justified text died when we stopped using monospaced fonts with double spaces strewn between every second word to fill up a line. Flush left text just looks terrible now.

Comment author: hwc 24 April 2011 01:42:34AM 1 point [-]

The default font is much less readable than other fonts...

I prefer sans-serif fonts for reading on any kind of screen. Why not try specifying no font face or font size at all and use the browser default?

Text is too small.

I do not normally notice this, since I have set an absolute minimum font size on my browser. I agree it looks awful under the default settings.

Comment author: arundelo 21 April 2011 10:59:32PM 0 points [-]

A nice thing about Verdana compared to most sans-serif typefaces is that Verdana's uppercase letter "I" has serifs, so it doesn't look like a lowercase letter "l" (or, when italicized, a slash).

Comment author: wedrifid 21 April 2011 11:17:02PM 1 point [-]

A nice thing about Verdana compared to most sans-serif typefaces is that Verdana's uppercase letter "I" has serifs

Make that all sans-serit typefaces. By definition. ;)