wedrifid comments on Epistle to the New York Less Wrongians - Less Wrong

90 Post author: Eliezer_Yudkowsky 20 April 2011 09:13PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (271)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: wedrifid 24 April 2011 12:51:30PM 0 points [-]

It can be jarring when the two styles collide, of course.

There is far more than a difference of styles at work.

Comment author: TheOtherDave 24 April 2011 02:16:15PM 0 points [-]

Well, that's portentous. Is this meant as a back-reference to the things you've already discussed in this thread, or as an intimation of things left unsaid?

Comment author: wedrifid 24 April 2011 03:19:18PM *  0 points [-]

Is this meant as a back-reference to the things you've already discussed in this thread, or as an intimation of things left unsaid?

The former, but I suppose both apply. Either way I thought enough had been said and wanted to exit the conversation without particularly implying agreement but without making a fuss.either. A simple assertion of position was appropriate. While strictly true saying "further conversation would just involve spinning new ways of framing stuff for the purpose of arguing for a position and generally be boring and uninformative" would represent connotations that I didn't want to convey at the time. The conversation to that point was positive and had merely exhausted the potential. Quit before it is just an argument.

Since you asked.