In keeping with my analogy let's translate your position into the corresponding position on physics:

I see a universe which contains intelligent agents with opinions and/or beliefs. Then I see conversations about physics and reality talking about beliefs being "true" or "false". From the context and explanations, "true" seems to mean very different things. Like:

"My beliefs" or "The beliefs of most agents in a particular place" or "Those beliefs which fulfill arbitrary metric X"

Likewise, "false" inherits its meaning from whatever definition is given for "true". It makes sense to me to talk about opinions and/or beliefs . They're important. If that's what people are talking about when they discuss truth, then that makes perfect sense. What I do not understand is when people use the words "true" or "false" independently of any agent's opinion. I don't see what they are referring to, or what those words even mean in that context.

Do you still agree with the changed version? If not, why not?

(I never realized how much fun it could be to play a chronophone.)