Sewing-Machine comments on What is Metaethics? - Less Wrong

31 Post author: lukeprog 25 April 2011 04:53PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (550)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Eugine_Nier 28 April 2011 03:57:25AM 1 point [-]

How do you determine which one is accurate? What observable consequences does each one predict? What do they lead you to anticipate?

Moral facts don't lead me to anticipate observable consequences, but they do affect the actions I choose to take.

Comment author: [deleted] 28 April 2011 04:03:14AM 2 points [-]

Preferences also do that.

Comment author: Eugine_Nier 28 April 2011 04:06:28AM 1 point [-]

Yes, well opinions also anticipate observations. But in a sense by talking about "observable consequences" your taking advantage of the fact that the meta-theory of science is currently much more developed then the meta-theory of ethics.

Comment author: Peterdjones 28 April 2011 12:57:47PM -1 points [-]

But some preferences can be moral, just as some opinions can be true. There is no automatic entailment from "it is a preference" to "it has nothing to do with ethics".