Perplexed comments on On Being Okay with the Truth - Less Wrong

33 Post author: lukeprog 02 May 2011 12:17AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (71)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Perplexed 02 May 2011 07:03:15PM 2 points [-]

Neither side in such a debate is objectively incorrect.

And a moral realist, such as myself, thinks you are dead wrong about that. I have offered an objective criterion for choosing sides in the debate, as well as a justification for that criterion that is ultimately based on satisfying people's preferences to the greatest extent possible. Yet you are unimpressed and go back to reciting your original opinions.

Oh well. I tried. HAND.

Comment author: Jonathan_Graehl 02 May 2011 11:07:40PM 2 points [-]

I have offered an objective criterion for choosing sides in the debate, as well as a justification for that criterion that is ultimately based on satisfying people's preferences to the greatest extent possible.

I couldn't find where you did this in the parents. Could you link or repeat?

Comment author: Perplexed 02 May 2011 11:51:13PM 1 point [-]

Whoops. You are right. I made this proposal here and here and in the discussions that followed.

Comment author: Jonathan_Graehl 03 May 2011 01:35:54AM 0 points [-]

Thanks. Interesting thread. It's a nice hope. It makes me feel good to imagine that it works, and our alien overlords will therefore be fair :)

Not much for me hangs in the balance with this question. I already know that if I feel like I'm a good person, It feels good. But of course I'm interested in how this self-satisfaction lines up with how people are generally judged. I guess it would become crucial if I became more aggressive. Most people are really cautious (at least as far as their image goes).