Eliezer_Yudkowsky comments on Your Price for Joining - Less Wrong

44 Post author: Eliezer_Yudkowsky 26 March 2009 07:16AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (53)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: ciphergoth 26 March 2009 08:58:18AM 16 points [-]

I think it's about risk to credibility. If I refuse to join, my reputation is entirely my own; it flatters my fierce independence of mind, in contrast to the sheeple. If I join, anything about the organisation might reflect on me, might be used to mock me. Joining is sticking my neck out; making an excuse not to is always the safer choice.

So the group norm we really need to establish is that if you want to criticise someone for joining, only a solid case is acceptable; a cheap shot based on joining behaviour should reflect badly on the speaker.

Comment author: Eliezer_Yudkowsky 26 March 2009 09:01:29AM 3 points [-]

So we want to encourage people to assemble more solid-sounding cases for not joining?

I think what we want to encourage is that "I haven't the time because I'm working on X" is acceptable; or better yet, silence. "Your website is the wrong font" is what we need to get away from.

Comment author: ciphergoth 26 March 2009 10:03:13AM *  6 points [-]

If I'm saying why I shouldn't join, either of "I haven't the time" or silence is fine. If I want to say why you shouldn't join, we should set the bar high, so that if I use joining as a cheap shot against you I look bad. "You joined a website with a stupid font" is what people fear, and so that might be what we need to act against.

Incidentally, what timezone are you in and when do you sleep? I'm always a bit surprised to get responses from you in the morning...

Comment author: hhadzimu 26 March 2009 06:44:58PM 5 points [-]

Eliezer Yudkowsky does not sleep. He waits.

Comment author: gwern 27 March 2009 03:02:44PM 0 points [-]

Mm. I don't like 'waits'; it sounds like he's wasting his time, and it doesn't have enough LW/OB injokes. Maybe 'He updates priors.'?

Comment author: Eliezer_Yudkowsky 26 March 2009 10:13:01AM 5 points [-]

It should be obvious from looking at the timestamps of my comments. I don't sleep.

Comment deleted 26 March 2009 01:57:58PM [-]
Comment author: MichaelVassar 26 March 2009 08:33:43PM 6 points [-]

That would be a serious offense, but it's a joke in Eliezer's case. A bad joke though, encouraging a serious problem. Loosing most of their productivity through inadequate sleep is a common nerdy error mode.

Comment author: pre 26 March 2009 08:38:29PM 2 points [-]

Innit. I quite like the sleep deprivation high, but it's not a good state for thinking straight. And I also love sleeping and dreaming.

Comment author: SoullessAutomaton 26 March 2009 10:44:57PM 1 point [-]

There's always polyphasic sleep schedules. Assuming those actually work, which is not at all well-established...

Comment author: gwern 27 March 2009 02:55:02PM 3 points [-]

FWIW, my own experiments with polyphasic sleep have convinced me that they do work, but at the price of a distressing fraction of one's brainpower & creativity.

Comment author: SoullessAutomaton 27 March 2009 04:50:46PM 4 points [-]

As I'm sure you're aware, a lot of anecdotal accounts of polyphasic sleep have suggested no loss of cognitive or creative function (after a 1-3 week adjustment period), but those are difficult to evaluate without an external metric; certain kinds of cognitive impairment can paradoxically make you feel you're thinking more clearly (c.f., "I drive better with a couple drinks in me").

I've been intrigued by the idea but have been held back by issues of work schedule, inability to spare two weeks for adjustment, and lack of a way to clearly measure how stupid it makes me.

Comment author: gwern 28 March 2009 03:08:42AM *  7 points [-]

As I'm sure you're aware, a lot of anecdotal accounts of polyphasic sleep have suggested no loss of cognitive or creative function (after a 1-3 week adjustment period), but those are difficult to evaluate without an external metric; certain kinds of cognitive impairment can paradoxically make you feel you're thinking more clearly (c.f., "I drive better with a couple drinks in me").

Oh yes, I was well aware of that. What I did was play 20 rounds of GBrainy a day and look at my scores. (Why GBrainy? Because I didn't have a few score of comparable IQ tests handy, and it was available in Ubuntu, and was reasonably fun to play.) I forget the exact stats, but it wasn't uncommon for my score to drop by 1/3 compared to when I was sleeping normally. What seemed to be most hard-hit was working memory, which really hurt on the mental arithmetic ones.

(The obvious criticism is that I didn't actually adjust, but I don't think there's any way to prove that either way.)

Comment author: AnneC 26 March 2009 06:14:46PM 2 points [-]

No one person is "in charge of the future of humanity". I know you were probably being somewhat flippant, but still.

Comment author: JulianMorrison 26 March 2009 02:02:02PM 3 points [-]

Do you mean people are actually saying "I won't join, because your fonts suck"? Or are they just dropping messages to the effect that your fonts suck into your suggestions box, and not joining - and the connection is surmised?