What is your probability estimate that a person who imagines having a full-body orgasm for one hour a day over ten years will develop the ability to have one just by imagining it (or something like that)?

25-90 percent, with a wide range because I don't know if men can do it or what fraction of women can learn to do it. Web pages Google finds for "orgasm on command" or publicly available reference material, among other sources, claim fairly consistently that some women can be trained to do this, and the gist of it is that it takes months rather than years. There are specific instructions to follow, different in detail but not different in kind from the ones you give in the original post. I have not yet seen a video of the cervical motions that would prove they aren't faking it, and I haven't seen mention of training men, and I haven't spent enough time on it with my wife to confirm or disconfirm it firsthand. Furthermore I haven't actually read the Amazon book I cite above; I read another detailed procedure that you'll have to find on your own, and people there indicated that the two were similar.

(I cringe too when I see people give pretentious names to themselves like "Lord Prophett". Yuck.)

For what it's worth, I tried Manfred's experiment and nothing interesting happened. (I understand "imagining a toothache" to mean imagining a visual or abstract image that I associate with toothaches, and allowing my attention to shift very quickly between the imagined object and the non-imagined location of the teeth where the toothache is supposed to be.)

I had success with it. My procedure was to think "What if my tooth hurt" and pay attention to my tooth as though I were concerned about it, and in a few seconds it started hurting when it didn't before.

Enlightenment gives the meditator enough self awareness to see their biases, and they don't care enough to reduce them. I can't imagine this alternative, are you really proposing it?

I can't imagine why you can't imagine that this alternative might be true.

Perhaps I misunderstood that metaphor you used in post #1, where the mind is like a distorted lens and if you get the right self-awareness you can infer the distortion and compensate. Bias is a distortion, right?

In any case, I agree with you in that I can imagine that someone who is self aware but doesn't have the concept of an unbiased estimate of reality might not have the motive or conceptual tools to identify the bias.