wedrifid comments on No coinductive datatype of integers - Less Wrong

4 Post author: cousin_it 04 May 2011 04:37PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (138)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: wedrifid 05 May 2011 06:00:33PM 1 point [-]

At least jump from BB to BB_2!

BB_2?

Comment author: Plasmon 05 May 2011 06:04:32PM 6 points [-]

The BusyBeaver function for Turing machines with a halting oracle.

Aaronson

Comment author: benelliott 05 May 2011 08:05:13PM 2 points [-]

I'm sorry to ask this question, because it seems very stupid, but how exactly would one create a set-up where a Turing machine, as in head-and-tape style thing, actually interacts with a halting oracle?

I don't doubt that its possible but I can't think of an elegant way to do it.

Comment author: cousin_it 05 May 2011 08:33:25PM *  4 points [-]

Wikipedia has a detailed explanation of the setup.

Comment author: wedrifid 05 May 2011 07:16:23PM 0 points [-]

Ahh, so that's what the <Can someone recall the title of Eliezer's parable in which the genius level humans spend thousands of years deciphering the messages sent by the not-so-smart universe simulators?> were using!

Comment author: Zack_M_Davis 05 May 2011 08:00:57PM 9 points [-]

<Can someone recall the title of Eliezer's parable in which the genius level humans spend thousands of years deciphering the messages sent by the not-so-smart universe simulators?>

You may be thinking of "That Alien Message." Best wishes, the Less Wrong Reference Desk.

Comment author: wedrifid 05 May 2011 09:47:31PM 0 points [-]

Thankyou! I'd been looking for that one for a while.