You are not actually being all that informative, since there remains a distinct supsicion that when you say some X is meaningless-to-you, that is a proxy for I-don't-agree-with-it.

Zorg said the same thing about his pan-galactic ethics.

I notice throughout these discussions that you never reference accepted dictiionary definitions as a basis for meaningfullness, but instead always offer some kind of idiosyncratic personal testimony.

Did you even read the post we're commenting on?

That doesn't affect anything. You still have no proof for the revised version.

Wait, you want proof that getting what I want is what I care about most?

Other people out there in the non-existent Objective World?

Read what I wrote again.

I don't think moral anti-realists are generally immoral peopl

Read.