dxu comments on Conceptual Analysis and Moral Theory - Less Wrong

60 Post author: lukeprog 16 May 2011 06:28AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (456)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: dxu 23 November 2014 09:10:53PM *  1 point [-]

So why do people believe it? (emphasis mine)

From Vaniver's comment:

I don't think there's a single agreed-upon theory.

What "it" are you speaking of?

Comment author: TheAncientGeek 24 November 2014 02:25:06AM -1 points [-]

The lesswrongian theory of ethics, If you don't believe there is such a singular entity, you couldn't say so...I'm hardly going to disagree.

Comment author: dxu 24 November 2014 05:02:29AM *  1 point [-]

I doubt you'll find anyone here seriously saying that we've found a definitive theory of metaethics. That is our eventual goal, yes, but right now, there are at best several competing theories. No absolutely correct theory has even been proposed, much less endorsed by the majority of LW. So the answer to your question ("Why do people believe it?") is, as far as I can tell, "They don't." My question, however, is why you think this is something really bad, as opposed to something just slightly bad.

Comment author: TheAncientGeek 24 November 2014 10:45:58AM *  0 points [-]

If you look upthread, youll see that what I think is really bad is advising people not to study mainstream philosophy.

I also think it bad to call philosophy diseased for not being able to solve problems you can't solve either.

And it might be an idea to add a warning to the metaethics sequences: "Before reading these million words, please note that they don't go anywhere".