handoflixue comments on Holy Books (Or Rationalist Sequences) Don’t Implement Themselves - Less Wrong

32 Post author: calcsam 10 May 2011 07:15AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (149)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: handoflixue 12 May 2011 11:06:56PM *  0 points [-]

indicates the existence of some reinforcing social mores.

I think we can both agree that even LessWrong has social mores. The topic is "unquestionable dogma."

Having been to a UU church and attended UU sermons, I cannot understand how you could possibly portray it as an "unchallenged consensus".

Edit: Sorry about the edit, and completely understood :)