DanielLC comments on Should I be afraid of GMOs? - Less Wrong

10 Post author: Pavitra 19 May 2011 01:29AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (60)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: loqi 19 May 2011 06:38:40PM 0 points [-]

Less selected for human non-toxicity?

Comment author: DanielLC 19 May 2011 07:58:48PM 0 points [-]

More, actually. I'm not sure what they go through before selling GMO food for human consumption, but I'm pretty certain peanuts wouldn't have passed the test.

Comment author: Chala 20 May 2011 02:35:45AM 0 points [-]

The peanut is an interesting example. I think projects are underway to produce modified varieties that lack the allergens which people tend to react to.

Comment author: loqi 19 May 2011 08:16:05PM -1 points [-]

The assumption that we can better determine toxicity with our current understanding of human biology than thousands of years of natural selection seems questionable, but peanuts are certainly a good lower bound on selection's ability.

I also don't have much confidence that the parties responsible for safety testing are particularly reliable, but that's a loose belief.

Comment author: DanielLC 20 May 2011 01:06:32AM 3 points [-]

Natural selection wasn't attempting to make it harmless to humans. Especially in plants that didn't evolve nearby humans.