mstevens comments on What bothers you about Less Wrong? - Less Wrong

18 Post author: Will_Newsome 19 May 2011 10:23AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (160)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: mstevens 19 May 2011 02:33:49PM 19 points [-]

There's too much talk of Bayesianism in fuzzy conspiracy terms and not enough "here's the maths. learn.".

Comment author: mstevens 19 May 2011 03:17:58PM 16 points [-]

also, I hate getting karma when I'd rather have a reply.

Comment author: NancyLebovitz 19 May 2011 04:45:40PM *  2 points [-]

I could vote this up, but instead I'll say that it's especially annoying when I post articles which mostly get karma rather than replies.

Comment author: randallsquared 20 May 2011 01:36:54PM 0 points [-]

I believe "articles which mostly" would make that much clearer.

Comment author: NancyLebovitz 20 May 2011 02:54:34PM 0 points [-]

You're right. Corrected.

Comment author: [deleted] 20 May 2011 12:59:35PM 0 points [-]

Amen (and voted up).

Comment author: gwern 19 May 2011 06:35:49PM 4 points [-]

Your own criticism is kind of fuzzy. What exactly does one write about? For example, would http://www.gwern.net/Modafinil#ordering-with-learning be the sort of Bayesian discussion you'd want to see, or is that too elementary and you'd rather something that looks like a later chapter of PT:tLoS?

Comment author: mstevens 19 May 2011 07:02:45PM 4 points [-]

That's the sort of thing I was thinking of. I want a whole series of content from elementary to advanced.

I suppose what I'm calling for is LW to write a stats textbook with a LW angle on things.

Of course possibly the answer is that such books already exist and I should go read them instead of LW.

Comment author: atucker 20 May 2011 02:28:22AM 0 points [-]

What would you call a LW angle on things in the context of a math textbook?

Comment author: mstevens 20 May 2011 01:05:32PM 0 points [-]

I'm not totally sure (I want to read the book!), but at the very least it'd have more real-world applications than the books on the subject I've looked at.

Comment author: wallowinmaya 19 May 2011 07:47:37PM *  1 point [-]

Ähm, do you know of this introduction by Eliezer?

Here is another one, which I found to very helpful, by komponisto

If that does not suffice read the "Technical explanation" of ( I meant "from", albeit it's not that funny) Eliezer. And if you aspire to become a Jedi Bayesian, just read E.T. Jaynes himself.

Comment author: wedrifid 19 May 2011 07:53:01PM 6 points [-]

If that does not suffice read the "technical explanation" of Eliezer.

Technical Explanation of Eliezer. I'd like to see that. ;)

Comment author: wallowinmaya 19 May 2011 08:40:06PM 3 points [-]

;) In German there is simply one word for "by, from, of". Kinda handy.