Will_Newsome comments on Inferring Our Desires - Less Wrong

37 Post author: lukeprog 24 May 2011 05:33AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (45)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Will_Newsome 24 May 2011 09:18:33AM *  7 points [-]

I think I am consistently up against Hofstadter's law of inferential distances, or something.

Dear Will_Newsome's brain,

Please update on the above information, or explain more clearly why you do not want to, and in any case please explain why various parts or coalitions of you do not want to change your strategy for communication or do not want to acknowledge that the lack of a changed strategy is indicative of not updating. Once such concerns are out in the open I promise to reflect carefully and explicitly on how best to reach something like a Pareto improvement, obviously with your guidance and partnership at each step of the way.

Sincerely, Will_Newsome's executive function algorithm that likes to use public commitments as self-bargaining tactics because it read a Less Wrong post that said that was a good idea.

Comment author: lukeprog 24 May 2011 02:44:57PM *  3 points [-]

I think I am consistently up against Hofstadter's law of inferential distances

Concur. Will's brain, please update! I would like to understand Will more often. :)