Manfred comments on Pluralistic Moral Reductionism - Less Wrong

33 Post author: lukeprog 01 June 2011 12:59AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (316)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Manfred 02 June 2011 05:04:56AM 0 points [-]

If you don't go looking for it, you won't find it.

Rather than chastising me, why not explain how "forbidden" is objective?

Re: shooting people: it was a joke. The WTF was not with respect to shooting people. It was because your demand was a non sequitur.

Comment author: Peterdjones 02 June 2011 12:48:18PM *  -1 points [-]

Rather than chastising me, why not explain how "forbidden" is objective?

For start: are you aware of various (googleablle) standard defenses of metaethical ojectivism?

Comment author: Manfred 02 June 2011 10:06:56PM 1 point [-]

I am aware of various defenses and find them all thoroughly lacking, but I doubt I have exhausted even the common possibilities. Go for it.

Comment author: Manfred 05 June 2011 10:33:18PM 1 point [-]

Is there some other place where you have defended metaethical (or even moral) objectivism?