torekp comments on Pluralistic Moral Reductionism - Less Wrong

33 Post author: lukeprog 01 June 2011 12:59AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Article Navigation

Comments (316)
Tags: metaethics morality

Comments (316)

Sort By: Popular
Best Popular New Controversial Top Old Leading

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: torekp 08 June 2011 10:16:37PM *  0 points [-]

For what it's worth, I think what's really being inferred by the advice-giver is:

  • 1 Granting your (advisee's) starting point, you ought to lose weight.
  • 2 Less calorie consumption and more calorie burning leads to weight loss.
  • 3 Therefore you ought to consume less and burn more calories.

The advisee's desire portrays the starting-point as a truth.

Comment author: poqwku 11 June 2011 12:05:13AM *  0 points [-]

Perhaps so, but then the normativity stems from premise 1, leaving premise 2 as non-normative as ever. But the question is whether premise 2 could be a plausible reduction basis for normative claims.

Powered by Reddit Powered by Reddit