lukeprog comments on Pluralistic Moral Reductionism - Less Wrong

33 Post author: lukeprog 01 June 2011 12:59AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (316)

Sort By: Leading

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: lukeprog 08 June 2011 10:37:27PM 1 point [-]

I didn't spend more time on reductionism because that is covered in the reductionism sequence. This post is already too long; I don't have the space to re-hash all the arguments for reductionism. Chappell already knows what's in the reductionism sequence, and why he disagrees with it, and that is a different discussion.

Comment author: timtyler 09 June 2011 11:04:45PM *  0 points [-]

Luke's position seems more reasonable here.

I have to say that the "following" around here is kinda irritating to me too.

There's a scene from The Life of Brian that comes to mind - the "you've got to think for yourselves" scene.