Emile comments on Official Less Wrong Redesign: Nearly there - Less Wrong

26 Post author: matt 24 May 2011 07:20AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (72)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Bongo 24 May 2011 02:10:46PM *  11 points [-]

If we go through with the double karma, let's at least collect statistics: given that a user voted something up/down on one karma, with what likelihood did they also vote it in the same direction on the other karma?

Maybe it'll be revealed that for most posts, most users either click neither or both, and in the same direction.

Comment author: Emile 24 May 2011 03:32:53PM 3 points [-]

"Double karma" is a weird phrasing - from what I understood, "agree/disagree" shouldn't have any impact beyond a single post, we don't keep a tally of how many people agreed or disagreed with each user ... right?

Comment author: gwern 24 May 2011 07:53:36PM 3 points [-]

we don't keep a tally of how many people agreed or disagreed with each user

Maybe we should. I think I'm a very agreeable fellow. But maybe that's the cognitive biases talking...

Comment author: matt 24 May 2011 05:28:33PM 1 point [-]

Right.

Comment author: gjm 24 May 2011 08:42:32PM 5 points [-]

I worry that if we decouple "I agree with this" and "I like this", the latter will correlate less well with contributing usefully to LW than the un-decoupled "vote up" currently does.

I don't have any particularly convincing reasons why I should worry that; just a vague feeling that it'll have more tendency to reflect poster status, applause lights, random witticisms, etc., and less tendency to indicate insight and expertise. Then again, looking at my own comment scores, I can't say that my highest-rated comments have been the ones with most insight or expertise behind them as things are...

Comment author: Emile 25 May 2011 08:32:37AM 2 points [-]

Hm, I have the opposite impression, so let's break this down.

Current reasons to vote on a post:

A: Agree/disagree with the conclusion

B: Think the post is well argued / badly argued

C: Think the post is witty / appeals to applause lights

Right now the votes are A + B + C, now it would become B + C, you're worried about the increased weight of C, I'm happy about the increased weight of B :)