Less Wrong is a community blog devoted to refining the art of human rationality. Please visit our About page for more information.

Nic_Smith comments on Are the Sciences Better Than the Social Sciences For Training Rationalists? - Less Wrong

3 Post author: James_Miller 31 May 2011 05:45PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (38)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Nic_Smith 31 May 2011 11:32:30PM 5 points [-]

Do you mean actually reading older literature, or academic analysis of older literature? If the latter, a quick look at the Wikipedia entry for literary theory seems to show that the field is full of confusion:

...many contemporary theorists and literary scholars believe either that "literature" cannot be defined...

and many of the schools of thought listed there seem to be about writing a bottom line, and then making whatever work of literature (whatever that is) is being examined fit.

Comment author: Vladimir_M 01 June 2011 02:35:37AM *  5 points [-]

I meant actually reading older literature, but third-party analysis and commentary can be very helpful, as long as you're not taking their claims for granted. I certainly agree that there is a whole lot of nonsense produced in the humanities in general, so caveat lector.