handoflixue comments on The Landmark Forum — a rationalist's first impression - Less Wrong

11 Post author: Nisan 01 June 2011 03:55PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (44)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: handoflixue 16 June 2011 08:41:22PM 1 point [-]

If X sues everyone who calls it a cult, you probably have fairly strong evidence that it is a cult. I think you have to evaluate how reasonable the lawsuits seem: Would this be the sort of thing an established, legitimate company you trust would sue over? Ciphergoth's example of Alcor suing people who accused it of fraud, for instance, strikes me as potentially reasonable - I think most companies would take legal action there.

As a general heuristic, I'm not aware of any respectable business which is often referred to as a cult and takes legal action against this. Apple does not sue people who talk about their fans as zealots / blind / cultists / etc., for instance. It's also, as far as I know, not a solid legal case, unlike fraud, intellectual property, etc..

Thus, I'd generally conclude that "X sues anyone for calling them a cult" is a pretty good heuristic for "X is not an organization I trust."

Whether they're actually a cult seems moot, past that :)