= 27d567bc2d48d9f40e9ccc20ea370b15)
lukeprog comments on Rational Romantic Relationships, Part 1: Relationship Styles and Attraction Basics - Less Wrong
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
= 783df68a0f980790206b9ea87794c5b6)
Loading…= b715d02e85f7b3b4ae65ca3d3e450868)
Subscribe to RSS Feed
Powered by Reddit
= f037147d6e6c911a85753b9abdedda8d)
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (1529)
Luke also has the advantage of that this is his job.
It is not uncommon for research articles to have 50+ references, and review articles often have over 300 references.
Edit: Luke's articles do have way more than the usual number of references. This article has approximately 120 sentences, with 37 notes and about 150 references, which doesn't make sense the way that I am familiar with. I am used to references referring to cited sources, and am not sure how Luke is using it. If it is a list of works consulted that makes sense.
Though, this particular post was actually written before I was hired by SIAI at the beginning of September.
I assume you're using software to collect references as you research / write? And then you have the software disgorge your collection of references at the end? What software are you using?
Nope. It's still all a manual process because all the programs I've tried aren't good enough, and don't sufficiently improve my workflow. (You may also notice that my preferred format for references is my own, instead of one of the standards that I have to use when writing for peer-review.)
You don't even use something like OttoBib?
That might help a little, but mostly I cite papers not books. Do you know of one that doesn't suck, for papers?
Endnote doesn't suck at all; it just doesn't do the things you were demanding like deduce citation from pdf.
Negative.