army1987 comments on Rational Romantic Relationships, Part 1: Relationship Styles and Attraction Basics - Less Wrong
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (1529)
It has no terribly good Italian equivalent either, but this doesn't make it hard to talk in a Bayesian way: you just say stuff like “it's likely that X, given that Y”. (In particular, ISTM that --among the kind of people usually I hang with at least-- “folk probability” resembles Bayesianism much more than frequentism, and most people who use frequentist statistics only give lip service to it without being actually convinced it makes all that sense.)