Eliezer_Yudkowsky comments on London Meetup 05-Jun-2011 - very rough minutes - Less Wrong

7 Post author: Alexandros 09 June 2011 01:40PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (16)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Eliezer_Yudkowsky 09 June 2011 07:42:34PM 9 points [-]

Normally, it's a four-year liberal arts degree to learn the subtle arts of weighing up unreliable human-generated evidence and turning it into useful information

I've never heard of that being taught in college. Is there a Bayesian stats class involved? Could these alleged evidence-weighers combine two likelihood ratios with a prior?

I mean, I'm sorry, but the above is just a ridiculous assertion. If there were any four-year university degree which taught people how to weigh evidence correctly, the world would look very different from the way it currently does.

Comment author: Nornagest 09 June 2011 07:51:32PM *  5 points [-]

David_Gerard's reasoning seems to me to depend less on the assertion that a four-year liberal arts degree is sufficient to extract truth from human-generated evidence by some set of external standards, and more on the assertion that however flawed the liberal-arts methodology is, WP:* generates some unique and serious issues of its own.

That seems pretty reasonable to me.

Comment author: David_Gerard 09 June 2011 08:05:47PM -2 points [-]

Pretty much. The Wikipedia method is actually worse.