Peterdjones comments on A Defense of Naive Metaethics - Less Wrong

8 Post author: Will_Sawin 09 June 2011 05:46PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (294)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Peterdjones 12 June 2011 07:50:34PM *  2 points [-]

I don't think I've ever been clear about what people mean to assert when they talk about things that don't reduce to physics/math.

SInce you can't actually reduce[*] 99.99% of your vocabulary, you're either so confused you couldn't possibly think or communicate...or you're only confused about the nature of confusion.

[*] Try reducing "shopping" to quarks, electrons and photons.You can't do it, and if you could, it would tell you nothing useful. Yet there is nothing that is not made of quarks,electrons and photons involved.