Peterdjones comments on A Defense of Naive Metaethics - Less Wrong

8 Post author: Will_Sawin 09 June 2011 05:46PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Sort By: Best

Show:

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Peterdjones 23 June 2011 01:37:48PM 1 point [-]

or rather [you should do X] = [the statement that, if believed, would cause one to do X if one were an ideal and completely non akrasic agent]

Comment author: Will_Sawin 23 June 2011 02:10:52PM 1 point [-]

Correct.

Comments (294)