Vladimir_Nesov comments on A Defense of Naive Metaethics - Less Wrong

8 Post author: Will_Sawin 09 June 2011 05:46PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (294)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Vladimir_Nesov 30 June 2011 09:16:56AM *  0 points [-]

I believe that you believe it, but I'm not sure it's so. There are many reasons for any event. Specifically, you use austere debating in real arguments, which suggests that you place more weight on the method than just as a tool for exposing confusion.

(You seem to have reacted emotionally to a question of simple fact, and thus conflated the fact with your position on the fact, which status intuitions love to make people do. I think it's a bad practice.)

Comment author: lukeprog 30 June 2011 09:18:55AM 0 points [-]

What do you mean by 'austere debating'? Do you just mean tabooing terms and then arguing about facts and anticipations? If so then yes, I do that all the time...