asr comments on How not to move the goalposts - Less Wrong

4 Post author: HopeFox 12 June 2011 03:45PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (71)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: asr 12 June 2011 09:44:08PM 7 points [-]

I'd like to defend HopeFox here.

Whenever the people around you treat something as a moral issue, I think it's wise to consider it that way yourself. When somebody says "I have a terminal value that says 'I want my society to have X/~X', and therefore I will vote to ban it", it's usually time to decide how valuable you consider X/~X to be.

You might decide that the given thing is morally neutral, but you can't easily evade the question. And my strong sense is that a large fraction of the public in the US and other western countries does consider wage equality a moral issue. There may be deep disagreement about whether equality of gender outcome is good or bad, but the question is certainly on the table.

My experience has been that gender is a problematic subject in nearly any social setting. But it's worth at least tiptoeing slowly towards it, since it won't become less problematic in the near future if we don't at least accustom ourselves to thinking about it.

Comment author: Perplexed 13 June 2011 12:08:02AM 3 points [-]

Upvoted. If I were to rewrite my critique of the OP, it would be to complain that he/she treated compensation equity as if it were only a moral issue.