I gave you an up vote, but I've got mixed feelings about it.
I dress casually, and not to impress, but I wonder if I'm missing something.
Is it plausible that people who want to affect the world should find a way to care enough about social skills to trot them out for occasional use, but mostly (especially when young) spend most of their time on other things?
Maybe a rationalist community can share the mental work of dressing well (keeping track of fashion and good deals) so that it's less onerous for individuals.
Yesterday I attended a meetup where the discussion turned to fashion for a time (because apparently the mini-camp participants were given some instructions on fashion as a useful part of instrumental rationality). (Unfortunately none of us knew much about the topic so the discussion turned into "how can we find an expert to advise us for minimal cost?") It was mentioned that dressing "badly" can be a useful signalling device, and some examples were given. Here's an attempt at a more complete list of possible signals one might be sending by dressing "badly".
The idea here is, if you do decide to start dressing "well", know what you're giving up first. (Of course you're also giving up possibly implying that nobody taught you how to dress and you're not sufficiently strategic to have thought of learning it yourself. Or implying that you don't have the mental, financial, and/or social resources to keep up with fashion. A lot of signaling depends on what your audience already knows about you, or can infer from your other signals.) See also Yvain's related post, Why Real Men Wear Pink and comments there.