gwern comments on When is further research needed? - Less Wrong

0 Post author: RichardKennaway 17 June 2011 03:01PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (80)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: gwern 18 June 2011 03:41:55PM 2 points [-]

Are you thinking of cases in which my enjoyment of a movie is ruined because someone has given me an unwanted 'spoiler'?

Not really, because this depends in part on human psychology, and we'd like to discuss more general agents than that. (Why couldn't other agents find out the spoilers, decide it's worth seeing, and then give themselves temporary amnesias so as to enjoy the twist ending? etc.)

I am thinking of cases where your seeking information has consequences. Cases like Omega are most obvious ('Omega comes to you and says he filled both boxes only if you would not ask for additional information' or something like that).

But they can be more subtle - for example, I've been reading up on price discrimination for one of my Nootropics footnotes, and it occurs to me that an Internet company like Amazon could snoop on your web history (through any number of bugs), assess your intellectual level and whether you comparison shop (receive additional information), and then dynamically adjust its prices to leave you with as little consumer surplus as possible - leaving you worse off than if you hadn't been receiving information.

Comment author: NancyLebovitz 18 June 2011 03:57:07PM 0 points [-]

I'd be faintly surprised if they aren't doing it already.

Comment author: gwern 18 June 2011 09:03:07PM 1 point [-]

As would I. Reading http://33bits.org/2011/06/02/price-discrimination-is-all-around-you/ I infer that the research is going to discuss existing online price discrimination in future posts, to which I look forward.