EvelynM comments on Community roles: teachers and auxiliaries - Less Wrong

7 Post author: calcsam 22 June 2011 10:52AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (69)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: EvelynM 22 June 2011 08:11:40PM 6 points [-]

This looks to me to be a recipe for adhering to a standard set of documents and roles, not a recipe for empirically investigating reality as it is, together with other investigators.

On [5], just saying you're avoiding a gender stereotype is different than actually avoiding it.

Comment author: BenLowell 23 June 2011 08:01:03PM *  3 points [-]

In this post and the next one, I will outline the roles in Latter-day Saint communities. In the following posts, I will draw more conclusions as to which roles would be ideal for rationalist communities.

Comment author: calcsam 23 June 2011 05:19:54AM 5 points [-]

This looks to me to be a recipe for adhering to a standard set of documents and roles, not a recipe for empirically investigating reality as it is, together with other investigators.

Reasonable. However, this doesn't make it unuseful as an example. The set of instructions on how to run a McDonalds, for example, is an exceedingly efficient piece of, essentially, software. (Which can be seen in how widely it has propagated.) Likewise here.

Comment author: EvelynM 23 June 2011 11:39:01PM 4 points [-]

The recipe for running a McDonalds wouldn't work for running a design firm. One of them values doing the same thing over and over, and one of them values doing new things and old things in new ways.

I think that the recipe you're proposing is more about doing the 'authorized' thing. LessWrong is more about doing the figuring it out thing.