Jayson_Virissimo comments on Most-Moral-Minority Morality - Less Wrong

-3 Post author: byrnema 27 June 2011 04:28PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (35)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Peterdjones 27 June 2011 10:21:01PM *  -1 points [-]

I don't think that a good analogy. i've never heard of a carnivore who thought meat eating was morally better. Their argument is that meat eating is not so much worse that it becomes an ethical no-no, rather than a ethically neutral lifestyle choice. (Morally level ground).

People can even carry on doing something they think is morally wrong on the excuse of akrasia.

And gay marriage is becoming slowly accepted.

Comment author: Jayson_Virissimo 23 February 2012 11:29:44AM *  1 point [-]

I don't think that a good analogy. i've never heard of a carnivore who thought meat eating was morally better. Their argument is that meat eating is not so much worse that it becomes an ethical no-no, rather than a ethically neutral lifestyle choice. (Morally level ground).

I have. The argument went something like this:

  • For humans, an action that is natural for humans is more moral than an act that is not natural for humans, all else equal.
  • For humans, eating (some) meat is natural.
  • Therefore, for humans, eating (some) meat is more moral than not eating (some) meat, all else equal.
Comment author: Peterdjones 15 August 2012 04:16:00PM 1 point [-]

Presumably they hunt their own meat...going to the supermarket is pretty unnatural.