timtyler comments on People neglect small probability events - Less Wrong

11 Post author: XiXiDu 02 July 2011 10:54AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (67)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: timtyler 04 July 2011 10:46:29PM *  0 points [-]

Isn't it more likely that someone realizing that they have been subverted by a selfish meme would be trying to self-modify?

I struggle to understand what is going on there as well. I think some of these folk have simultaneously embraced a kind of "genes=bad, memes=good" memeplex. This says something like: nature red in tooth and claw is evil, while memes turn brutish cavemen into civilized humans. The memes are the future, and they are good. That is a meme other memes want to associate with. Obviously if you buy into such an idea, then that promotes the interests of all of your memes, often at the expense of your genes.

Comment author: torekp 05 July 2011 01:19:38AM 0 points [-]

The longer we argue, and the more we ponder, the more we empower the memes. I don't have a problem with that.